From Free Mentality To Abundance Economy: A Necessary Mindset Shift For Growth And Innovation

Chukwubuikem Felix Amaefule picture

Chukwubuikem Felix Amaefule
Jun 12 . 12min read

Mindset Shift for Growth and Innovation

Growing up in Nigeria, I witnessed something that has stayed with me for decades: a deep cultural struggle around paying for things that carry utility value, especially when intangible. From reluctance to pay electricity bills to apathy toward public waste management levies and even cable TV subscriptions. The reluctance to pay for these services was not merely a matter of affordability but a deeply ingrained cultural mindset. This mindset, which I term the "mindset of physical tangibility," dictates that if something is not physically tangible, even if it brings immense value, people struggle to pay for it. This prevailing mindset equates value with physical tangibility. This isn’t a character flaw. It’s cultural conditioning. One that, if left unchallenged, continues to erode not only public utilities but also private sector innovation, personal productivity, and national competitiveness.

The Mindset of Physical Tangibility


Let me introduce a concept I call the "mindset of physical tangibility." If something isn’t physically tangible, we often undervalue or ignore it, no matter how critical or impactful it might be. This mindset explains why many still struggle to pay for software or cloud-based tools, even if they promise exponential gains in productivity, income, and quality of life.

During my 15+ years of working across product development, product management, program management, education technology and engineering consulting, I’ve seen this play out repeatedly. I’ve worked with startups, companies, educators, and engineering teams that had access to life-changing digital tools, sometimes even for free or at highly subsidised rates, yet remained reluctant or uninterested in adopting them.

The Case of Engineering Design Software


Let’s take engineering design as a case in point. I’ve consulted for firms that rely on cracked versions of design tools or free, insecure alternatives. The productivity loss is staggering. In one particular project, a team using cracked, outdated software was producing results at 25% of the speed and accuracy of a team using licensed, cloud-based solutions.

When we ran a side-by-side benchmark:
  •  Team A (using secure, licensed software) completed 5 critical design sprints in 3 weeks.  
  • Team B (using free, outdated tools) completed just 1 sprint in the same timeframe.
Beyond productivity, there were serious concerns about data security, legal exposure, and cross-collaboration bottlenecks. The irony? The cost of the software, when prorated across the value it generated, was less than the weekly cost of running diesel generators in the office.


About the Author:
Chukwubuikem Felix Amaefule is a digital manufacturing expert, product strategist, and EdTech leader with over 15 years of industry experience. He currently leads the transformational team at Generative CAD Services Limited, building scalable learning and product development solutions to democratise making in Africa.

Share
Tags
Chukwubuikem Felix Amaefule

Chukwubuikem Felix Amaefule
Technical Writer

Related Posts

No post found!


Comments

No comments found!